Web2Cf Clarke v Hurst NO 1992 4 SA 630 (D). 3J? v Latimer (1998) SJ No 731 (not yet repotted) in Canada. 4S v Hartmann 1975 3 SA 532 (C); S v De Bellocq 1975 3 SA 538 (T). 5Canadian Criminal Code s 241(b). 6Ex parte Die Minister van Justisie: in re S v Grotjohn 1970 2 SA 355 (A) 365. WebWhich one of the following statements CANNOT be reconciled with the judgment in Clarke v Hurst NO 1992 (4) SA 630 (DB)? (1) Feeding loses its special symbolic significance where the patient 1s quite unaware that feeding Is being withheld from him or her, (2) It is generally accepted that a doctor acts lawfully if he or she administers medication to a terminally ill …
CLARKE v HURST NO AND OTHERS 1992 4 SA 630 D .pdf
WebPosts tagged as Clarke v Hurst NO and Others Still waiting for an answer: Physician assisted suicide in South Africa x Bookmark On 30 April 2015 the Gauteng Division of … WebThis approach is similar to that of the court in Clarke v. Hurst NO, [2] which found that continued artificial feeding would 'not serve the purpose of supporting human life as it is … quotes of electricity
Southern African Legal Information Institute
Web9.2 Case Law 9.2.1 Mitchell v Dixon) Facts The facts as they appear from the judgment of Innes ACJ are as follows. On 22 February 1913, the plaintiff consulted Dr Howden of Durban to whom Dr Mitchell WebPersistent vegetative state was defined in the South African case of Clarke v Hurst No and Others 1992 (4) SA 630 (D) as "a neurological condition where the subject retains the capacity to maintain the vegetative part of … WebWhere there is a living will/advanced directive (Clarke v Hurst) • No justification for distinction between omission to institute life-sustaining treatment and discontinuation of treatment instituted • Liability for discontinuance of life-sustaining treatment will depend on whether there is a duty to continue with such treatment quotes of education by abdul kalam